![]() My thought would be to use it strictly to view the images, not to edit. You can display the RAW data but no colors or optics corrections applied so not at all a Raw converterīut still very usefull, I am mainly using it to compare different versions of tiffs coming from my true RAW processors also to cull initially my new RAW pictures and send them to my true RAW processors, by launching à program or by copy Paste to an open one Yes Faststone very fast very usefull to cull ,compare classified directly from your foldersīy défaut it display the jpg embedded, not always the same resolution as the raw data, ![]() But I don't care, because a jpeg is just fine for culling (seeing if a portrait subject's eyes are closed, etc). When I click on a raw image n FastStone, I have no idea if I am seeing the converted raw data or the embedded jpg. ![]() It is free, So why not just try it for yourself. But I love it for culling because it displays the image full screen and it is my default viewer when I click on an image attached to an email, etc. But I prefer more advanced (paid) software as an editor. ![]() I have used this software solely as an image viewer for 15-20 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |